Children deserve love, empathy, security, the enjoyment of childhood, and the freedom to develop their own
identity. A parent’s task is not to shame, terrify, and mold their child into submission and silence.
In The Child’s Song: The Religious Abuse of Children (1995), Dr. Donald Capps, once Princeton
Theological Seminary’s Professor of Pastoral Theology, explores 4th Century St. Augustine of Hippo’s
abuse as a child, the psychological signs of abuse in the content and style of the New Testament book of
Hebrews, the recurring Biblical theme of a child (Isaac, Jesus) obediently dying for the honor (piety or
propitiation) of the father, and the intimation of an endangered child in the Gospels’ biography of Jesus.
Click this box for a review of chapters 2-6, which offer Dr. Capp’s most profound insights.
In the heartbreaking appeal for the repressively silenced and pacified child that is For Your Own Good:
Hidden Cruelty in Child-Rearing and the Roots of Violence, Dr. Alice Miller summarizes two centuries of
cruel child-rearing guidance (”Poisonous Pedagogy”) and the “war of annihilation against the self” that
childhood abuse produced in three individuals, including -- most prominently -- Adolf Hitler. Click this box
for more on Dr. Miller’s book.
“To take the child’s side unequivocally against the child’s tormentors is to regain one’s soul,
and to witness in behalf of the child in others is to participate in the reclamation of their souls as well.”
Dr. Donald Capps, Professor of Pastoral Theology, Princeton University
In Parenting for a Peaceful World (2010 Kindle edition), Australian psychoanalyst and psychologist Robin
Grille summarizes a chilling history of two millenia of socially accepted and religiously justified child abuse in
the West, its pathological impact on a child’s personality and emotional development and on society at large,
and society’s painfully gradual evolution from authoritarian toward more empathetic parenting. “Much of the
history of childhood in the west is a hellish tale of widespread neglect and abuse, and the further back into
history we look, the more brutally we see children treated, with abusive practices institutionalized or
embedded in cultural and religious rites.” (p4)
In Breaking Their Will: Shedding Light on Religious Child Maltreatment (2011), journalist Janet Heimlich
explores the harm inflicted by authoritarian religious cultures. “Christians have followed a centuries-old
path,” Heimlich writes, “of viewing children in a loathsome light--a path paved with ideas about sinfulness.”
Heimlich documents how conservative evangelicals have sustained this skeptical, “almost fearful,” view of
children, evangelicals’ avid defense of corporal punishment, and their oppressive obsession with child
obedience and sinfulness. A quarter of the book explores the phenomena of religious emotional and
psychological abuse and intellectual suppression through religious spurning (shaming) and terror. The
last half of the book addresses sexual abuse and religiously-motivated medical neglect.
In Abraham on Trial: The Social Legacy of Biblical Myth (1998), Stanford anthropologist Dr. Carol Delaney
offers a feminist critique of the Genesis 22 narrative of Abraham’s faithfully obedient near-sacrifice of his
son and the idealization of that narrative in each of the three major monotheistic traditions (Judaism,
Christianity, and Islam). “Why,” Dr. Delaney asks, “must loyalty to God be proven at the expense of one’s
child rather than expressed through one’s love and care for one’s family and fellows?” (p118). Noting the
absence of Sarah’s knowledge or consent in the narrative, Dr. Delaney argues that its idealization played a
significant role in undergirding patriarchy and society’s assumption of the father’s ultimate authority in the
family.
© Intrinsic Dignity 2012
Chapter 2 recounts St. Augustine’s lament over the severe beatings he suffered at school -- which he compared to the
worst torture devices known to mankind -- his unanswered prayers for deliverance, his parents’ laughter at those
prayers, and his logically tortured theological justification of that abuse. Dr. Capps also connects that abuse to the
20+ references in St. Augustine’s Confessions to the “scourgings” or “floggings” of God and to St. Augustine’s
emphasis on the “stern Jehovah of the Old Testament.” Dr. Capps also explores signs of St. Augustine’s emotional
neglect of his own son Adeodatus, born out of wedlock to become the innocent victim of St. Augustine’s “deep,
overwhelming shame,” who yet revered his father and longed for his approval.
Chapter 3 explores the dissociative endorsements of physical abuse in biographies of Billy Graham, David Wilkerson,
Aimee McPherson, and James Dobson, and observes similar dissociative effects provoked by traumatic religious
ideas of shame and punishment.
Chapter 4 explores signs of childhood abuse and justification that permeate both the substance and the compressed,
disjointed style of the Book of Hebrews. Hebrews depicts Jesus’s death as a “sacrifice,” praises Jesus’s “obedience
unto death,” and honors Abraham’s faith in offering to sacrifice his son Isaac. Hebrews also pivots repeatedly
between reminding the audience that they are in perilous danger of provoking God’s anger and wrath and briefer
words of reassurance to the audience. Hebrews 12:5-11 equates God’s discipline with love and compares God’s
discipline with parental discipline. “The sign of God’s love is not in his mercy, as Jesus taught, but in his
chastisements.” Hebrews 12:10, which contrasts parental discipline as being done “for pleasure,” signals the author’s
possible abuse as a child. Dr. Capps summarizes the book as follows:
From passage to passage, and page to page, the profound insecurity of the author of Hebrews is apparent to
the reader, at least to the reader who is not under the thrall of the abusive structure itself. Even the author’s
claim that Christ’s sacrifice puts an end to the need to propitiate God offers no real comfort or relief, because for
those who persist in sinful behavior, not only is Christ’s sacrifice of no avail, but the punishment will be even
more severe than if Christ had made no sacrifice at all. That there is no final resolution is communicated both in
the content and in the style of the letter. There is a pervasive sense of endagerment throughout, and the source
and cause of such endangerment is God, the very one on whom one’s hope for ultimate rest and peace
depends.
(p75).
Chapter 5 is entitled “Abraham and Isaac: The Sacrificial Impulse.” It critiques the Bible for perpetuating a theory of
child sacrifice and Christian writers for their continuing idealization of Abraham’s near-sacrifice of Isaac.
Chapter 6, provocatively entitled “The Child Jesus as Endangered Self,” cautiously suggests an interpretation of
Jesus’s allusions to God as his personal father as a reaction to the stigma of being born out of wedlock:
The desire to be another man’s son: I think this is a far more powerful and potent emotion for a child than the
desire for a father whose presence is more palpable and protective, or the sense of gratitude one feels for his
father’s steady dependability. And I think this is precisely what the child Jesus would feel and experience with
special keenness, as he had unusually powerful and urgent grounds for wishing he was not the son of the man
who impregnated his mother. This strong wish to be another man’s son is the deep inspiration for his view of
God as a personal father, a father who effectively replaces human fathers in his understanding of himself as
someone’s son. He would know himself as the son of Abba, and thus, as no longer illegitimate or adopted. He
was the true son of Abba and thus of no other.
(p114).
have obedient, docile, and good children whom they can later provide with a good education.” (p11). “It is always our main
purpose to make children into righteous, virtuous persons,” the guide intoned, which is accomplished by enforcing strict “rules
of orderliness” and “a strict obedience to parents and superiors and a trusting acceptance of all they do.” (pp. 11-12). The
guide assured parents that if they broke a child’s will within the first 3 years of life, “they will never remember afterwards that
they had a will, and for this very reason the severity that is required will not have any serious consequences.” (p13).
Dr. Miller agrees that children are indeed likely to consciously repress their suffering. But the experience and feelings of
humiliation, resentment, rage, anxiety, shame, insecurity, and helplessness -- though forgotten -- still leave an indelible mark.
For many, that repressed anger ultimately finds an outlet, years later, in aggression and abuse toward their own children,
spouses, or outside groups (e.g., against homosexuals, undocumented immigrants, people of other faiths, and other out-
groups). For many others, the anger is turned inward in a continuing war of annihilation against the self.
In the section on “Poisonous Pedagogy,” Dr. Miller recounts, among other sources, a 1748 German
parenting guide that urged parents to “drive out the willfulness and wickedness” of their children during
infancy, when they “become angry, cry, and flail about,” by “means of scolding and the rod,” so that “they will